NAS Lemoore Military Attorneys

Defending Service Members Worldwide Since 1987.

Aggressive, reliable defense for U.S. service members when it matters most.
San Diego Based / Worldwide Military Representation
Military Law Center Logo

Naval Air Station Lemoore military attorneys from the Military Law Center defend active duty and reserve Sailors and service members stationed aboard NAS Lemoore at courts-martial, administrative separation hearings, and provide legal advice for other employment matters such as non-judicial punishments and correcting military records.  Our military defense attorneys provide critically needed legal advice to service members in NAS Lemoore accused of crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

About Military Justice

The military justice system at NAS Lemoore is complex and different from the civilian criminal system used in Kings County, Fresno County, or the state of California.  It requires a deep understanding of military laws and regulations.  Most importantly, it demands an experienced litigator to stand up to a Navy command and unrelenting prosecutors.

Naval Air Station Lemoore (NAS Lemoore), located in the farmlands of Central California is home to the newest and largest master jet base of the US Navy.  With Strike Fighter Weapons School Pacific, and several Carrier Air Wings, NAS Lemoore is a valuable West Coast facility for the US Navy.  Currently, the installation is home to 1,850 active-duty personnel and 3,000 family members.

The NAS Lemoore military attorneys at the Military Law Center are Marine Corps veterans who served and litigated cases throughout the Marine Corps.  They know service members, what it means to serve, and they know the military commands.  When your career and reputation have been tarnished by an accusation, our military attorneys will defend your legal rights aboard NAS Lemoore.

Investigations aboard NAS Lemoore

Our military defense attorneys advise Sailors and other service members during the investigation phase of their case.  It could be a law enforcement investigation into sexual assault or domestic violence, or it may be a command investigation into drug use or driving under the influence.  Unfortunately, due to Navy policies, most Sailors and other service members will not receive a detailed military defense counsel (JAG) during the investigation stage.  Most often, a judge advocate will begin representing them when the government prefers courts-martial charges or notifies a service member of administrative separation.  Regardless of the UCMJ offense, Sailors aboard NAS Lemoore can retain the attorneys at the Military Law Center while they are under investigation.

Courts-Martial Attorneys | NAS Lemoore

Sailors and other service members stationed at NAS Lemoore accused of criminal offenses may discover their case is referred to a court-martial.  After the investigation, a Navy prosecutor will review the evidence and prefer charges against an accused.  For serious felony level allegations such as murder, rape, and sexual assault, the NAS Lemoore Office of the Special Trial Counsel will try the case at a General Court-Martial.  These Navy Judge Advocates are specially trained litigators with experience trying high-profile cases.  Sailors and other service members accused of serious allegations should retain experienced civilian defense attorneys to ensure their rights are protected.  If the Navy is allocating its best and brightest lawyers to take an accused’s freedoms away, the service member should retain the best military defense attorneys they can afford.

For NAS Lemoore courts-martial cases that do not require felony level attention, military commands may refer charges to a special court-martial.  Cases like drug use, false official statements, unauthorized absence, and general orders violations may be handled through NAS Lemoore’s legal process.  A special court-martial conviction can still cause a service member to be punitively separated with a bad conduct discharge.  A bad conduct discharge can cost a service member hundreds of thousands of dollars in veterans benefits.  So, working with the Military Law Center’s attorneys to avoid a federal conviction is in their best interest.

Table of Contents:

Get Help Now

Call us Today at (760) 536-9038 or complete the below form for a free, no obligation initial consultation.

Contact Us

Phases of a NAS Lemoore Court Martial

  • Allegation is Made
  • Investigation
  • Preferral of Charges
  • Article 32 Hearing
  • Case Referred to Court-Martial
  • Arraignment
  • Discovery
  • Written Motions Filed
  • Motions Argued at Article 39
  • Final Pre-Trial Matters Filed
  • Trial Begins with Jury Selection (Voir Dire)
  • Opening Statements
  • Witnesses and Evidence Presented
  • Closing Arguments
  • Verdict

Administrative Separations at NAS Lemoore

Enlisted Sailors and other service members near NAS Lemoore accused of misconduct may be notified for administrative separation and will need the help of experienced military defense attorneys.  After an investigation, a command may choose to notify the service member with the specific allegation for which they may be separated.  The MILPERSMAN is the authority for Sailors.  When this occurs, the service member will get an opportunity to review the documentary evidence and prepare a defense with their attorney.  In addition to presenting contradictory documentary evidence, the service member and their defense team can call witnesses, cross examine government witnesses, make an opening statement, and provide a closing argument.

Phases of an ADSEP Board at NAS Lemoore

  • Allegation is Made
  • Investigation
  • Command Issues Written Counseling
  • Marine or Sailor Notified of Separation Proceedings
  • Member Selection (Voir Dire)
  • Opening Statements
  • Documentary Evidence Presentation
  • Testimony from Fact and Character Witnesses
  • Closing Arguments
  • Board Decision is Announced

Three Questions at an ADSEP Board

MLC icon

Basis?

This question asks whether there is enough evidence to prove the allegation in the notification.

MLC icon

Retention or Separation?

If basis is met, the members must decide whether to retain or separate the Marine or Sailor.

MLC icon

Characterization of Service?

If separation is recommended, the members must characterize the enlistment as either honorable, general (under honorable conditions), or other than honorable.

While the administrative separation board proceeding is supposed to be about determining if the service member is suitable for continued service in the Navy, it has lifelong potential consequences.

  • The Sailor’s job, healthcare, and salary are at risk.
  • If separated, the board members will recommend a characterization of service: honorable, general (under honorable conditions), and other than honorable (OTH). For service members without a previous honorable enlistment, this means they could lose the GI Bill, VA home loan, VA healthcare, and disability payments.
  • Immigration consequences exist for service members who naturalized less than five years ago.

Civilian military defense attorneys from the Military Law Center are available to help guide, advocate, and defend Sailors and other service members facing administrative separation aboard NAS Lemoore.

Boards of Inquiry | NAS Lemoore

Officers aboard NAS Lemoore in need of a defense attorney for a Board of Inquiry (BOI) need to look no further than the Military Law Center.  As former Marine Officers themselves, our attorneys have gone through Officer Candidate School, The Basic School, and know the incredible demands the Department of the Navy places on its junior and senior officers.

A Board of Inquiry at NAS Lemoore starts with an allegation.  Once an allegation of misconduct or substandard performance is made against an officer, the command reports it within 24 hours to Navy Personnel Command.  The allegation is documented in the Officer Disciplinary Notebook (ODN) aka the Black Book.  That entry is permanent, and it triggers the first flag officer in the officer’s chain of command to investigate.

When a flag officer reviews the completed investigation, they determine one of five options:

  1. No Misconduct Occurred, generate a Report of No Misconduct.
  2. Misconduct Occurred, Address Misconduct Administratively with a NPLOC or informal counseling.
  3. Misconduct Occurred, Document with Formal Counseling.
  4. Misconduct Occurred, Notify Officer of Intent to NJP.
  5. Misconduct Occurred, Prefer Charges at Court-Martial.

Depending on how the accused Officer chooses to proceed, the command may determine a Board of Inquiry is required.  The Show Cause Authority may convene a BOI or direct subordinate commanders to order the officer to show cause at a board of inquiry.  When this happens, the subordinate commanders will notify the Naval Officer of the alleged misconduct and typically include as an additional basis substandard performance or professional dereliction.

Probationary officers, those commissioned officers who have served less than six years and warrant officers with less than three years of time as an officer, are not entitled to a hearing.  Instead, the command may proceed with notification procedures and may separate the officer with an honorable or general (under honorable conditions).  In this case, the officer is entitled to submit written matters to be considered by the Secretary of the Navy.

The SECNAVINST 1920.6_ series governs the BOI procedures, composition, and rights of the officer at the hearing.  The board will have three senior officers, and they are tasked with determining if the Officer is suitable for continued naval service.  To do this, they must answer:

  1. Is there Basis?
    This means: is there enough evidence to support the allegation of misconduct, substandard performance, or dereliction of duty?
  2. Retention or Separation.
    If basis is met, the members will determine if the officer has potential for future honorable naval service.  If yes, they will vote to retain.  If no, they will vote to separate.
  3. Characterization of Service.
    If separation is required, the members with recommend a characterization of service: honorable, general (under honorable conditions), or other than honorable (OTH).

An officer may present documentary, audio, and video evidence, in addition to calling fact and character witnesses.  At NAS Lemoore, military attorneys retained by the Officer can ask questions of the members during voir dire, deliver an opening statement, cross examine government witnesses, direct witnesses called by the respondent, and give a closing argument.

As the Board of Inquiry has life changing consequences, it is essential to retain the best legal representation an officer stationed at NAS Lemoore can afford.  Even more importantly, it is best to get representation from the beginning because officers are unlikely to be provided a detailed military attorney (JAG) until approximately 30-45 days before their hearing.  The defense attorneys from the Military Law Center are ready to develop a career saving strategy today.

Non-Judicial Punishments

Minor misconduct occurring at or near NAS Lemoore may be handled through non-judicial punishment.  For many Sailors and other service members, an Article 15 hearing may be the precursor to an administrative separation board.  For misconduct related to drug abuse, civilian convictions, or sexual misconduct, an administrative separation board is required.  So, it is important to ensure the long-term strategy includes carefully deciding whether to accept non-judicial punishment or not.

When an incident occurs, a commanding officer may offer non-judicial punishment as a forum to their Sailor.  The Sailor then must answer the question: accept or deny the forum of NJP?  If they accept NJP, the service member must then decide whether to plead not guilty or guilty.  That’s right – Sailors and other service members can accept NJP and plead not guilty at the hearing.  They are also allowed to bring documentary evidence and fact witnesses to defeat the allegation.

When a service member at Naval Air Station Lemoore denies the forum of NJP, then the command may choose to: do nothing, issue a negative counseling, notify the service member for administrative separation, or prefer court-martial charges.

Any service member found guilty at NJP may appeal the NJP within five days to the next higher command.  To succeed on an NJP appeal, the service member must show a legal error, the punishment was unjust, or the punishment was disproportionate to the offense committed.

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Sailors and other service members stationed aboard NAS Lemoore may find their military record needs to be fixed.  They may need to correct an award, pull a Fitness Report, appeal the results of an administrative separation board or board of inquiry, or to fix any legal error or injustice.

Service members must petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) with DD Form 149.  When doing so, service members need to identify a legal error or injustice.  The NAS Lemoore military attorneys from the Military Law Center can assist with preparing the BCNR petition.

MLC icon

Why Hire a Civilian Attorney?

Hiring a civilian attorney for NAS Lemoore related military legal matters is about retaining experienced, competent, and compassionate attorneys.  NAS Lemoore military defense attorneys from the Military Law Center are well versed in military justice matters.  They served as Judge Advocates (JAG) and have handled legal matters aboard NAS Lemoore.  They continue to defend clients at NAS Lemoore and other military installations around the world.  As privately retained military attorneys, they do not report to anyone within the Navy.  Additionally, they are not distracted by requirements like standing duty, shooting at the rifle range, and attending annual training or weekly PMEs.  Importantly, they are available to provide competent legal advice and can join your defense team today.

Unfortunately for many Sailors and other service members aboard NAS Lemoore, when they face legal issues during a criminal or command investigation, they are not assigned a free military counsel because it is too early in the process.  The detailed military lawyers available through the Navy DSO are prevented from representing them until they are formally detailed to the case.  That often requires preferred charges for a court-martial or a notification for administrative separation.

So, while the Navy commands get advice from the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate and Office of the Special Trial Counsel at the earliest stages of the litigation, Sailors and other service members are often denied the same critical legal advice.  Is it fair to go up against the government without an attorney?  No.  But should you retain the best possible legal team you can afford?  Yes – and that is why hiring a NAS Lemoore military defense attorney from the Military Law Center early on in your case is highly recommended.

Contact the Military Law Center today to schedule your free consultation with a NAS Lemoore military attorney.

For A Free Consultation

Contact Us Today

Contact Us

Military Law Center:
Your Trusted Ally

Military Law Center is a team of experienced and aggressive civilian military defense attorneys dedicated to protecting the rights of service members in Camp Pendleton and across the nation.

Military Law Center Is Ready to Help You – Right Now.
Call Us Today – (760) 536-9038